Since the first cover in 1927, Time magazine has chosen one subject relevant to the year’s events to call Person of the Year. As they say, “spotlighting their impact”. Selections were significant, historic, and universally understood. Now, as every other media entity in the Western world has been tasked to do, I believe this yearly occurrence has, in recent years, been designed to highlight the Left’s favorite pied piper - for good or ill.
Absolutely brilliant! And what a list... who would I pick? I think my vote has to go to ZDK, because honestly none of the candidates any year are really anything more than the latest or up and coming elites who gain favor is certain circles.
Circles that the average everyday American don't, and likely won't ever see or be part of. I can think of hundreds of people right now, far more deserving of the title "Person of the Year". But because these people don't live on the upper East Side of NYC, or fly in for the Met gala, we'll never know them.
Put simply, it's a sham. Another in an ever growing list. Perhaps they should rename it Time's "Sham of the Year" To me, it seems much more befitting.
Absolutely brilliant! And what a list... who would I pick? I think my vote has to go to ZDK, because honestly none of the candidates any year are really anything more than the latest or up and coming elites who gain favor is certain circles.
Circles that the average everyday American don't, and likely won't ever see or be part of. I can think of hundreds of people right now, far more deserving of the title "Person of the Year". But because these people don't live on the upper East Side of NYC, or fly in for the Met gala, we'll never know them.
Put simply, it's a sham. Another in an ever growing list. Perhaps they should rename it Time's "Sham of the Year" To me, it seems much more befitting.
Thank you! What a great reply 😽